Option 1:
First, to translate the first 8 lines:
John Keats first claims his interest and experience in works of art
and literature. He describes his credentials as a critic of the
Odyssey, by referencing Apollo, the Greek god of Poetry. The next
lines could translate, “I have heard a lot about Homer's 'The
Odyssey,' but my mind was blown when I heard Chapman speak it.”
We can concur that Keats knows a good
work when he sees it. His two epic similes have a surprising,
adventurous feel to them. The first demonstrates his pleasant
surprise, as though an unexpected gift had showed up at his doorstep.
This first simile empathizes with science, which even further
expands his credentials. He then compares his experience with what
Cortez (really Vasco de Balboa) may have felt just after seeing the
Pacific Ocean for the first time. This simile could empathize with
historians, hikers, scientists, you name it.
I like to compare it to music. Like
when you are listening to a song that you had heard many times
before, but never understood the meaning until you were lucky enough
not only to be paying attention to the lyrics line by line, but to
put them together as a whole and see connections that weren't obvious
to you. (this has happened to me before)
I believe Keats shows his roundness by
empathizing with different kinds of people with different interests.
This reaching out to a higher demographic allows more people to be
touched by this poem. Both a planet and an ocean can be seen as
whole, or examined for further detail, which scientists and artists
alike would most likely do without hesitation. It is apparent to me
that Keats intends to go far beyond reading Chapman's translation of
the Odyssey, as he is an adventurer of his own type.
I'm not sure what made me like Sylvia
Plath's “Metaphors” so much. It's hard to explain. I noticed
that there are nine syllables in each line, and there are also nine
lines(I'm not sure if this means anything). The first line could
indicate that the following lines could be metaphors themselves. The
two words “I am”(or I'm) are what give metaphors their identity.
So it could be said that every line in this poem is a metaphor.
Anything that can be put into print on paper could be the target of a
metaphor. Or, if this poem is a riddle, as mentioned in the first line, the answer could be
put into a metaphor for the poem: “I am every line of this poem!”
It even has nine syllables! The first line could be a metaphor for the riddle itself. ... “Metaphor
metaphor metaphor.”
Hi David, when I read your post the first time, I did not understand yur writing even thugh I had read the poem which I did not understand either. But I read your post again and now I get what you want to say about Keats' poem. He is talking about discoveries and their impact in the way how keats sees the world. His similes about the discoveries describe how atonishing is the world and how it surprises each one of us with its beuties. The way how you catch the poem in the third paragraph is really nice because sometimes you see the same thing every day, but you do not understand its beuty until you think about it and put all the pieces together, then you realizes how surprising is the world. I really like your third paragraph.
ReplyDelete