At first, I found Emily Dickinson's
poem “Because I could not stop for Death” to be frustrating. I
had to read it several times on several different days, on each of
which I had to be running a slightly different mood and level of brain
performance. It was for the same issue that I was initially drawn to
“The Man He Killed” by Thomas Hardy. To me, his poem was simple,
and I understood it easily, and it didn't take this stressful
coordination of my thoughts and evisceration of my leisure schedule
to understand.
Venting done, moving on.
The speaker's tone was a big point of
contention for me. I liked how Hardy accomplished a sort of accent,
which I perceived to be Scottish or Irish, as this helps to give the
poem somewhat of a whimsical mood. He speculates upon his foe as a
man largely just like him, who “thought he'd 'list, perhaps
off-hand-like, – just as I – ”(lines 13-14). This, I see, as
the speaker's acknowledgment of the value of human life, which my
prejudgment led me to doubt in Dickinson's poem. Whereas the speaker
in Dickinson's poem seems constantly drawn to Death, Hardy shows his
preference by sandwiching his description of what happened between
two stanzas that emphasize an obviously preferable alternative to
war. His fleetingness, given away by, “Yes; quaint and curious war
is!”(line 17), he actively tames, using two examples of how these
two men would be at the ready to help each other and be friends, had
their countries not been at war.
Both poems had to do with life and/or
death, which, for some reason, I liked.
I understand that Dickinson was
suicidal, and at first, I judged her concept of human life as
undeveloped beyond where her feelings of worthlessness had been keeping her,
which there is no real evidence of. Her romanticized depiction, “The carriage held but just
ourselves and immortality”(line 4), made it seem like Death was her ticket to
heaven/hell/the afterlife/whatever your preference. Before, this
seemed irresponsible to me.
I guess my issue could have been to do with
the stereotypical distinctions between men and woman. In the tone
and structure of Hardy's poem, he shows great integrity of
conscience, a trait I admire. Dickinson shows Death the normally
girly trait of wanting to maintain decency in polite company.
Initially, this angered me, but only after I mistakenly drew into
account an imaginary presence of danger to the people around her,
which she made no mention of. I came to that conclusion because of
the way she paints Death as a concrete character, even capitalizing
his name. I pictured Death as a serial killer, for
whom the speaker was consciously allowing herself to be seduced.
Upon further contemplation (some of which I have documented) on
Dickinson's mental state, and
ultimately recognizing her possible friendship with Death as a
development I do not totally understand, on top of the fact that
there is no evidence to support this in the poem whatsoever, I found
the strength to let it go.
Now, for a (hopefully) final
observation of my feelings regarding these works. Though I did
initially not like Dickinson's poem, it presented a depiction of
death that I have never thought about before. The last stanza gives
a hint that the preceding girth of the poem was a description of
something that happened to the speaker, maybe to her house. A
near-death situation. Or this is the event that caused her to think
about suicide for the very first time. I realized that over the
amount of time, “Centuries”(line 21), probably her friendly
depiction of Death became the best option for her, since confrontation is so hard to maintain for many women, and since the time
frame is so long, the speaker may just as well be seen as an
abstract, perhaps immortal, being. “Stopping for Death” was a
phrase that I struggled with for a while, whilst writing this
response. Now, I think it may mean that the speaker is telling of a
time when she was caught up in living with the same perspective,
doing the same things (her “labor and leisure”(lines 6-7)), and
maybe the experience with the house being destroyed eventually led
her to befriend the idea of dying, since they were so close at one
point.
I agree with you that some of these poems take a lot of time to understand. “The Man He Killed” was a little interesting. I like how you wrote about “the speaker’s acknowledgment of the value of human life” and they could “be friends if they weren’t at war. It is very strange and sad to think that you have to kill someone because it is your job. There is nothing personal between the two of them. On the other hand, even after reading “Because I Could Not Stop for Death” over and over, I could not understand it. It helps a lot to be pointed in the right direction. I did not know it is about suicide. It helps to hear some one else’s point of view.
ReplyDeleteI'm actually not completely sure it's about suicide. That was mostly just a speculation.
DeleteI like your post and the many speculations you include. I agree with Stephanie about the idea of killing someone because it is your job. That is a perspective that I know nothing about. I loved "Because I could not stop for death" it is fascinating to me that death was seen as civil and took his time cruising around to see sights for the person who is leaving the earth. I felt that this person just died without warning and that is why they state "He kindly stopped for me" I felt that it was a relief for them to die and that is why it was kind, like maybe there were terminally ill and it took a long time. Enjoyed reading your thoughts. Good Job. Deb West
ReplyDelete